Tuesday, 18 August 2026

5th Kingston Invitational: Round 2 (18 August 2026)

Round 2 of the 2026 Kingston Invitational tournament, played on the morning of 18 August 2026, provided more entertainment after the surprises and long-play controversy of Monday's opening round.

Adam Taylor (left) arrived 20 minutes late but still managed to overcome Rock Yu

Now occupying board one as top seed, with GM Danny Gormally relegated to the middle of the pairing list after conceding a first-round draw, was Adam A Taylor, rated 2269 but as yet untitled. That said, he didn't occupy the board until some 20 minutes into the round, which is risky given the briskness of the time control. His opponent, Rock Yu, worked up a very decent plus (in analysis engine terms) of around +2 and was threatening to up it to +3 when he committed a positional blunder on move 32, allowing Taylor's dismal light-squared bishop to escape imprisonment with 32...e5! There were some more inexplicable blunders to come, making me wonder whether the score might be at fault, culminating in White's 43 e6??.

On board two Thomas Villiers' double-fianchetto system for White didn't make much impression on his opponent as Peter Sowray gradually got on top. White did eventually manage to occupy the centre but it proved a rickety structure which Black expertly dismantled. GM Peter Wells commented on the finish on X...

I'll leave you to figure out how Black won. If you want to see the full game score, it's here

Peter Sowray's win against Thomas Villiers made it 2/2 for Black on the top two boards

Another a third set-back for the white pieces on the higher boards was Mark Josse's loss to Daniel Johnson of Sweden after a failed combination cost him a piece.

Overview of the top boards in round two of the Kingston Invitational

Further down the pairings, Keatan Patel seemed to be on the brink of a second IM scalp in the space of two rounds when he won Peter Large's queen for a rook and a minor piece but White's king managed to sneak away from its appointed place of execution to the queenside. It looked to be only a stay of execution but White then managed to conjure up a perpetual check with his remaining pieces.

"They seek him here, they seek him there..." Peter Large staged a Pimpernel-like escape from defeat.

Round 2 games at lichess


5th Kingston Invitational: Round 1 (17 August 2026)

There were a few surprises in store as the 5th Kingston Invitational Swiss Tournament got underway on 17 August at the Richard Mayo Centre, United Reformed Church, Eden Street, Kingston KT1 1HZ.

Councillor Thay Thayalan, the 192nd Mayor of Kingston-upon-Thames, paid us the compliment of opening the fifth edition of this popular event. He made the first move on the top board and enjoyed a bit of badinage with Danny Gormally, the one grandmaster in the field, as you can see from the smiling faces in the photo...

Danny Gormally persuaded Mayor Thay Thayalan to make the move 1 Na3 for his opponent

Once the game started in earnest, Phil Horspool was allowed to replace 1 Na3 with the rather more orthodox 1 e4. Despite being nearly 400 points below his formidable opponent, the Leicester man played a great game and was suddenly looking favourite when Gormally gave away the exchange on move 23. That said, it wasn't easy to see how to exploit his advantage but he was still a good deal better when a draw was agreed on move 55.

As well as the one grandmaster, there were three other IMs in the competition but two of them bit the dust at the first hurdle. Graeme Buckley was Black against Keatan Patel but in a typically complicated position he too went horribly wrong, coincidentally with the same bad move, Qb6, as had nearly been Gormally's undoing (in a completely different position). There were still some complications but the 19-year-old from Kenilworth navigated his way to a win.

Keatan Patel defeated IM Graeme Buckley in a complicated struggle.

Jack Rudd was the 2nd IM casualty of the afternoon, losing to Balahari Bharat Kumar. The game came down to a rook and pawns endgame the like of which I can't recall seeing before. I won't claim to have made sense of it in the short time available to appraise it but it became apparent that the titled player's extra pawn(s) were no match for the 17-year-old's menacing pair of passers. Anyone who thinks rook and pawn endings are dull should play through this game and be royally entertained.

Balahari Bharat Kumar overcame Jack Rudd in a terrific rook and pawns endgame.

This was a round of long games, the top five boards going to 55, 78, 65, 51 and 44 moves respectively. But nothing came close to the board six which went to an eye-watering, bottom-aching 172 moves. Care to guess one of the players involved? Those familiar with earlier Kingston tournaments will recall local man Peter Lalic and his predilection for ludicrously long drawn-out games. This time the long-suffering victim was his 75-year-old Kingston clubmate Alan Scrimgour. 

Peter Lalic

Alan Scrimgour

It really is time this sort of thing is outlawed by the rules. Open-ended playing sessions are a travesty of a sham of a fiasco of a mockery of two shams of a travesty, particularly for the young or the old. Maybe anyone aged under 15 or over 65 should be allowed to call a halt unilaterally after five hours' elapsed time and demand the game be adjourned or adjudicated. Yes, I know, everyone abominates adjudication but is it any worse than this? 

More fun (and elderly spleen) tomorrow...








Monday, 17 August 2026

5th Kingston Invitational Swiss, 17-21 August 2026

The 5th Kingston Invitational Swiss (17-21 August 2026) begins at 3.30pm this afternoon at the Richard Mayo Centre, United Reformed Church, Eden Street, Kingston KT1 1HZ, which is also the HQ of Kingston Chess Club.

The first round pairings are here: https://s3.chess-results.com/tnr1422361 ... 1&SNode=S0




There are nine rounds (one round today and two on each of the next four days at 10.00am and 3.30pm). The rate of play is 90 min + 30 sec / move.

The winner of the tournament will receive the Kingston Invitational Cup and £500, with £250 to second and £100 to third. The leading junior (17 or under) will receive the Barden Cup (named in honour of Guardian chess correspondent Leonard Barden) and £100. If players’ scores are level at the end of the tournament, a tie-break designated by the arbiters will be used. There will be no play-off.

Top seed is GM Danny Gormally and there are three IMs in the field (Graeme Buckley, Jack Rudd and Peter Large).

I shall be taking photos and posting reports here on my blog.

Tuesday, 26 August 2025

Double Dutch Game Score

Every now and then I come across a game score that has me completely foxed. The following is an example. It is the game Rudolf Loman v Lucien Serraillier, played on 23 May 1902 at the Kent Congress in Tunbridge Wells. Rudolf Loman (1861-1932) was a master strength player who won a number of unofficial Dutch championships in the 1890s. His opponent, Lucien Serraillier (1866-1919) was a lesser player but still quite strong and good enough not to finish last in this ten-player all-play-all which Loman won with 7/9. (I'll be posting more details of the tournament on BritBase in due course.)

Here's the score, initially frozen at the point where the game seems to veer off into insanity...

I keyed the game in from the source, which was the Western Morning News, 27 June 1902. I don't usually spend much time looking at the game while I'm entering the moves, but when I saw 17 Ne4 it set my chess player's antenna twitching. The instant I entered the move, I saw the whole story flash before my eyes. (And, note, I did not have an engine switched on.) My thoughts could be translated into words, thus: "wow, can he do that? Hang on, take the knight, White plays Bxb5+ and then grabs the queen next move - but surely Black will have more than enough material for the queen? Rook and two minor pieces. What am I missing?"

I stopped entering moves and looked harder. Nope, I still didn't get it. After checking the input moves against the printed score - they seemed correct - I finished entering the moves and saved the game. I looked again at the printed score...

Western Morning News, 27 June 1902
Western Morning News, 27 June 1902

As you can see, the newspaper has printed a diagram of the position after 21 Bxg6, which tallies with the one in the digitised game score. So that would appear to rule out input error. The above clip constitutes the entire report of the game given in the paper. There were no other comments made about it.

So what to make of it? Obviously, like any other game inputter, I sometimes spot errors in games found in newspapers, but they are usually perpetrated by much weaker players than Loman and Serraillier. Of course, strong players make mistakes too but I usually only spot these when going through the game later with an engine. What amazed me here was the fact that something I spotted instantly, which I would expect any self-respecting player rated 2000+ to see quickly, was apparently overlooked by the players.

Of course, it is still possible that the score was wrong. But what? A pair of moves missing somewhere?

There was just one comment made elsewhere which might have a bearing on what happened. Leopold Hoffer, in his column in The Field on 31 May 1902, said this of Loman's performance in the tournament: "Mr Loman's performance is excellent, although (on dit) not entirely unattended by a favourable element of chance." So was it a massive bluff which came off?

Monday, 18 August 2025

2025 Kingston Invitational: Best Game

John Saunders reports: the 4th Kingston Invitational tournament was honoured to have GM Daniel King judge the best game of the event. He came along to the prizegiving to announce his decision. He complimented the players on their play and told us there were so many decisive results that he had had to look at every game. He cited several games from earlier rounds as worthy contenders but they were ultimately displaced by a game played in the last round of the Open event, which he thought had the necessary 'sparkle' that a best game prize-winner needs. Well done, Bob Eames, for this splendid effort against Ewan Wilson, who also deserves great credit for a spirited counterattack which just fell short. Annotations are by me.


GM Daniel King presents the best game prize to Bob Eames.

Tournament Preview

Day 1 Report: Rounds 1 and 2

Day 2 Report: Rounds 3 and 4

Day 3 Report: Rounds 5 and 6

Day 4 Report: Rounds 7 and 8

Day 5 Report: Round 9 and Prizegiving


Sunday, 17 August 2025

2025 Kingston Invitational: Index to Posts

The 4th Kingston Invitational Chess Tournament took place 12-16 August 2025.

This is an index to the various posts reporting it.

Tournament Preview

Day 1 Report: Rounds 1 and 2

Day 2 Report: Rounds 3 and 4

Day 3 Report: Rounds 5 and 6

Day 4 Report: Rounds 7 and 8

Day 5 Report: Round 9 and Prizegiving

Best Game Prize: R Eames 1-0 E Wilson

2025 Kingston Invitational: Day 5 (Round 9, Playoffs and Prizegiving)

John Saunders reports: the 4th Kingston Invitational, held 12-16 August 2025 at the Richard Mayo Centre, Eden Street, Kingston-upon-Thames, drew to its conclusion on Saturday 16th. GM Jakub Kosakowski of Poland, who had already made sure of first place in the previous round, stretched his margin of victory to two points with a last-round win, while IM Ivan Valles Moreno (Spain) and FM-elect David Maycock Bates (Mexico) shared the second and third prizes.


Winner of the all-play-all, GM Jakub Kosakowski (centre), flanked by the players who shared second place, David Maycock Bates (left) and Ivan Valles Moreno.

The nine-round Open Swiss held alongside resulted in a tie for first between the two Norwegian FMs, Jacob Templen Grave and Gunnar Lund. They shared the money but played a two-game blitz play-off for the honour of lifting the trophy, which resulted in a 1½-½ victory for Jacob Templen Grave. WGM Michalina Rudzinska of Poland secured the third prize.

n.b. the complete crosstable for this event is available from chess-results.com via this link


Jacob Templen Grave (1st on tie-break), John Foley (Kingston CC President), Gunnar Lund (right)

WGM Michalina Rudzinska (Poland) receives her prize for finishing 3rd in the Open Swiss


Jai Kothari (left) and Shlok Verma made the best score (5½/9) by under-18 players in the Open Swiss. The blitz play-off to decide the destination of the Barden Cup was won by Jai Kothari, seen here receiving it from guest of honour GM Daniel King

GM Daniel King awarded the best game prize to Bob Eames for his last-round win in the Open event.

There was a second play-off between the highest scoring under-18 players for the honour of lifting the Barden Cup. The two players were Jai Kothari of Hampton School and Shlok Verma of Petts Wood & Orpington. Jai Kothari won the blitz play-off by 2-0.

All-Play-All, Round 9 (16 August 2025)

Despite the fact that first place had already been decided and with no norm chances at stake, the final round was as well contested as the eight previous ones. If you consult the crosstable above, you can see that only 16 of the 45 games ended in a draw, with just two bloodless encounters on the final day.

Ivan Valles Moreno vs Supratit Banerjee lasted 14 moves. The Spanish employed another theory-light queen's pawn opening, this time developing his dark-squared bishop outside the pawn chain in a Torre Attack. 


11-year-old Supratit Banerjee finished on a 50% score, gaining 13 rating points.

The game between the Polish FM Liwia Jarocka and CM Peter Lalic wasn't actually as 'bloodless' as I billed it above. It lasted only 20 moves but it packed quite a lot of incident into a short space, with both players having opportunities to establish an advantage. Black was still a bit better at the end but had only five minutes left to reach the time control.


Liwia Jarocka vs Peter Lalic

The game between the tournament winner Jakub Kosakowski and Graeme Buckley opened with a Rossolimo variation against the Sicilian and was a known line to around move 15. Black was doing fine until move 23 when he allowed White to get in a powerful e6 thrust which gave White a big advantage. A couple more inaccuracies was all it took for White to break through and deliver mate.


Jakub Kosakowski vs Graeme Buckley

Roland Bezuidenhout vs Adam A Taylor began with a Kalashnikov Sicilian and followed a known line where Black gives up a pawn for some Benkö-Gambit-like counterplay. White consolidated his extra pawn and for a while looked to have a significant advantage, but in the run-up to the time control it became fairly clear that a win was unlikely. But then, calamity - White committed a horrendous blunder and had to resign immediately after Black's obvious reply. This unexpected stroke of luck enabled Adam A Taylor to leapfrog his opponent into fourth place in the tournament.


Roland Bezuidenhout vs Adam A Taylor

The last game to finish was IM Peter Large vs FM-elect David Maycock Bates. The other day on Twitter/X, Peter Large expressed his sentiments about the tournament...

Point 2 is of course entirely correct but I must take issue with point 1. Peter Large is not, and never has been in my memory span, a very weak player. However, he is the oldest player in the field by some margin, turning 70 next spring, and anno domini is the most pitiless opponent of them all. Perhaps playing two games a day is too strenuous, particularly during the recent spell of oppressive weather we've (not) been enjoying. As one of the other players pointed out after the round, Peter's team chess record for Kingston CC in the past season has been outstanding. It's one area of chess where a retired player can perhaps retain an edge, coming fresh to an evening game after a relaxing day at home, whereas younger players who still have to work for a living may arrive a little jaded from their daytime responsibilities. 

The clash of Kingston Chess Club regulars, IM Peter Large and FM-elect David Maycock Bates, began with a Siesta variation of the Ruy Lopez, which, as a gazillion annotators before me have quipped, is far from sleepy. (Far be it for me to write anything original.) The game proceeded down a strange line with which I am unfamiliar. As it may have been to Peter Large, as he went wrong on move ten. It will be no consolation to him to know that I would have fallen for the same trick, which I looked up in an ancient opening book (Modern Chess Openings, 1965 edition) and found it was known back then. To rid himself of the bishop and pawn uncomfortably embedded in the heart of his position, he was obliged to surrender the exchange for a pawn. It took Black a while to unravel his position but once the queens were off the board, Black's advantage had become substantial. Thereafter David Maycock Bates found an accurate way to exploit his material advantage and lift himself into a tie for second place in the tournament, which was an excellent result for him.


Peter Large vs David Maycock Bates

The Congress Team

It would be remiss of me to close without some words of praise for the Kingston congress team who have done a splendid job in organising this event.

Firstly, tournament organiser Stephen Moss, who has been the driving force behind the congress these past four years. He deserves an award for his part in proceedings: I have in mind the Victoria Cross, for valour over and above the call of duty, or some such military-style award, rather than a mere civilian decoration such as an O.B.E. I can't remember who is credited with the saying "chess is war" but he got it slightly wrong. It should be "chess organising is war" and it should be recognised as the military undertaking that it undoubtedly is. Before the last round Stephen was presented with a small gift as a token of gratitude from his fellow officials and players. It was a copy of Peter Doggers' book The Chess Revolution. Hopefully it will inspire our beloved leader to write a follow-up to his excellent The Rookie, to be titled The Kingston Chess Revolution, telling the story of Kingston Chess Club's inexorable rise to eminence and success in recent years.



Kudos also to Paul McKeown for his excellent debut as the congress's Chief Arbiter. His ebullience and competence have ensured that the congress has gone without a hitch. He was ably and cheerfully supported by assistant arbiters John Bowley and Ed Mospan, both of whom earned arbiting title norms during the event.


Chief Arbiter IA Paul McKeown

John Bowley receives his arbiting norm certificate

Ed Mospan (right) also received an arbiting norm certificate for his work at the congress.

End Notes...

The Kingston Congress had a few nice touches that you don't get at every chess tournament. For example, there were plenty of refreshments on offer and they were all free. Take a look at the refreshments table at start of play each day...

... doughnuts, chocolate biscuits, even a chocolate cake...

... freshly squeezed orange juice and other good quality soft drinks...


... let's take another look at that cake.

... and of course I'm telling you this now, after the event, in case any freeloaders were tempted to come along and do a Homer Simpson on the doughnuts. Spectators, incidentally, were not encouraged in the playing area (where the refreshments were located) as there wasn't room to accommodate them. But, come next August, and (hopefully) another Kingston Congress, make a note in your diary - "free doughnuts" - and bear it in mind when deciding which tournament you want to play in.

I think that's a wrap. Hope you've enjoyed reading the reports as much as I have enjoyed writing them. (I may add a further post or two about the tournament in the coming week - watch this space)

Tournament Preview

Day 1 Report: Rounds 1 and 2

Day 2 Report: Rounds 3 and 4

Day 3 Report: Rounds 5 and 6

Day 4 Report: Rounds 7 and 8

Best Game Prize: R Eames 1-0 E Wilson

Useful Links

Twitter @johnchess (that's me)
Kingston Chess Club (there will be more reports there after the event)